Grant Morrison is one
of the most successful and influential comic book writers around today. So much so his ideas
were ripped off by the Wachowski brothers for ‘The Matrix'. He seems to have
taken this in his stride; after seeing the sequels he reportedly said, “They should
have kept stealing my ideas.” On the back of the dust jacket of his new book
Supergods: Our world in the age of the superhero, he looks like a comic book
villain, intense, bald, handsome, in a round collared jacked with gold buttons up to his
neck. His life has been shaped by comic books, as he tells us. Not only were
they a welcome diversion in his Scottish childhood and adolescence, they have
been his career. And now he has produced a book about both comics books and his
life.
And for the most part
it’s good. Any successful writer of comic books is going to be converscent with
the history of comic books, their characters, their stories, their tropes and
conventions. His view may be a little limited – he credits the writers of
Superman with the invention of the secret identity, ignoring the Scarlet Pimpernel,
Zorro and countless others. But as a history of comic books, it was for me
informative and interesting. He traces the impact of the world onto comic books
and the impact of comic books on the world, finding why a genre that was born
in the Depression and the Second World War, is increasingly popular in a time
of globalisation, terrorism and uncertainty. Heroes who spoke to the masses at
a time when the enemy was clear and in uniform, still speak, in altered voices
and with different attitudes, to our modern age, and Morrison has some
interesting ideas as to why.
The book lost me in
its more autobiographical sections, and discussing comic books of which I have
no idea. Reading an appraisal of any art work you don’t know is always
problematic. Comic books in particular depend heavily on their fans’ knowledge.
(This in itself was an innovation of Marvel, taken up by DC creating complex
worlds and multiworlds for their heroes to play in.) So when Morrison discusses Spawn, for example, at some length my eyes glazed over. Fans of Spawn may well be gasping
now, but having never read Spawn, there wasn’t much I could do about it.
I also didn’t
particularly care for his autobiography, and I skipped a lot of it. If I were
more knowledgeable about his work or a greater comic book fan, I imagine this
would have been much more compelling. Morrison comes over a little
self-involved, and perhaps he is. Even so, it gave me some insight into how
comic books are created and managed, both new and continuing titles and
characters. But having someone tell you about their drug days are as dull as
people who want to tell you about the enormous amounts they used to drink. It’s
probably significant to them, but hardly interesting to the outsider. There are
some exceptions to this rule, but this wasn’t one of them.
Al that said, I
enjoyed the book. (Although he dismissed the Phantom with one line about the 1996 film. Humph, I say. For those who don’t know the Phantom, he’s a bit like
Batman with a more positive upbringing – no superpowers, just fit, fast and
intelligent. Also he lives in the African jungle.) Oddly for a book about comics, it could have used more illustrations. A minor quibble. Those with a greater
interest in the genre will doubtless get more out of it, but still a good
writer is a good writer, regardless of the genre in which they work.
Not to be overly picky, but the Matrix was more levered off William Gibsons 'Neuromancer' than anything else.
ReplyDeleteWell, having never read the book, I can't gainsay you. Let's just say it appears the Matrix is one of those works that was both good and original: the parts that were good weren't original and the parts that were original weren't good.
DeleteThanks for your interest and your comment.
Nick
I would agree with that sentiment.
DeleteGreat articles by the way. Really enjoy the read!
Thanks for posting them.